Comments on: Twitter and e-mail bomb http://www.hackersblog.org/2009/05/13/twitter-and-e-mail-bomb/ United Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:20:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: 2fingers http://www.hackersblog.org/2009/05/13/twitter-and-e-mail-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-2164 2fingers Thu, 14 May 2009 22:39:03 +0000 http://www.hackersblog.org/?p=2164#comment-2164 No we didn't David. Because it's not a bug, it's a feature :) No we didn’t David. Because it’s not a bug, it’s a feature :)

]]> By: David http://www.hackersblog.org/2009/05/13/twitter-and-e-mail-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-2161 David Thu, 14 May 2009 21:21:09 +0000 http://www.hackersblog.org/?p=2164#comment-2161 How is it possible for a company like Twitter didn't think about this? Did you contacted them? How is it possible for a company like Twitter didn’t think about this?
Did you contacted them?

]]> By: 2fingers http://www.hackersblog.org/2009/05/13/twitter-and-e-mail-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-2155 2fingers Thu, 14 May 2009 18:54:17 +0000 http://www.hackersblog.org/?p=2164#comment-2155 I don't think they have a limit. Or maybe they have a limit after 200-300+ messages. I don’t think they have a limit. Or maybe they have a limit after 200-300+ messages.

]]> By: Andrei Rinea http://www.hackersblog.org/2009/05/13/twitter-and-e-mail-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-2153 Andrei Rinea Thu, 14 May 2009 14:21:03 +0000 http://www.hackersblog.org/?p=2164#comment-2153 How much efficiency does this method have? Maybe they set internal limits to how many addresses, how soon you can send again and so on.. (or maybe not, I'm just asking) How much efficiency does this method have?

Maybe they set internal limits to how many addresses, how soon you can send again and so on.. (or maybe not, I’m just asking)

]]> By: Alexu` http://www.hackersblog.org/2009/05/13/twitter-and-e-mail-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-2130 Alexu` Wed, 13 May 2009 10:03:30 +0000 http://www.hackersblog.org/?p=2164#comment-2130 Tare ! ;)) Ma mir ca nu au lasat doar " user " , sa fie mai scurt =)) Tare ! ;) ) Ma mir ca nu au lasat doar ” user ” , sa fie mai scurt =))

]]>