United
Loading....
- Yahoo! again - XSS in Uncategorized (357 Visits)
- Yahoo! again - bad settings? in Uncategorized (252 Visits)
- Fanii nostri in Uncategorized (183 Visits)
- Frustrant in Uncategorized (146 Visits)
- La multi ani România, la multi ani românilor in Uncategorized (137 Visits)
- Weblog.ro - Shell via Local File Inclusion in Uncategorized (119 Visits)
- Yahoo! epic fail - permanent xss unleashed in Uncategorized (50 Visits)
- ... in Uncategorized (38 Visits)
- XSS Ownage - hi5 vs. Yahoo! + video in Uncategorized (2 Visits)
- Ce nu se invata la scoala - Tipuri si tehnici spam/Hi5 (4) in Uncategorized (2 Visits)
- Ce servicii de mail folositi? in (121 Visits)
- Azi este ziua userilor hackersblog.org in (120 Visits)
- De reţinut in (117 Visits)
- Inca o pierdere de timp in (107 Visits)
- De tinut minte in (106 Visits)
- Twitter in (78 Visits)
- Un nou membru in (74 Visits)
- Interviu la Radio Lynx in (70 Visits)
- 2009 in (51 Visits)
- Editori noi. in (35 Visits)
- Ce nu se invata la scoala - Tipuri si tehnici spam/mail (2) in (199 Visits)
- Ce nu se invata la scoala - Tipuri si tehnici spam (1) in (139 Visits)
- Ce nu se invata la scoala - (D)DOS (5) in (104 Visits)
Loading....
- B7ackAnge7z (1)
- Nicu Calcea (1)
- andrasi zsolt (1)
- Ovidiu U (1)
- Dumitru (1)
- Andrei Rinea (1)

May 13th, 2009 at 12:03 pm
Tare !
) Ma mir ca nu au lasat doar ” user ” , sa fie mai scurt =))
May 14th, 2009 at 4:21 pm
How much efficiency does this method have?
Maybe they set internal limits to how many addresses, how soon you can send again and so on.. (or maybe not, I’m just asking)
May 14th, 2009 at 8:54 pm
I don’t think they have a limit. Or maybe they have a limit after 200-300+ messages.
May 14th, 2009 at 11:21 pm
How is it possible for a company like Twitter didn’t think about this?
Did you contacted them?
May 15th, 2009 at 12:39 am
No we didn’t David. Because it’s not a bug, it’s a feature